Human rights lawyer and activist, Dele Farotimi, has categorically denied authorizing anyone, including former Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi, to approach legal luminary Afe Babalola, SAN, on his behalf regarding his ongoing defamation case. The case stems from Farotimi’s book, Nigeria and Its Criminal Justice System.
Speaking during a visit from fellow human rights lawyer Tope Temokun at the Ekiti Correctional Facility, Farotimi emphasized his opposition to any form of mediation or appeals for his release, insisting that the legal process must take its natural course.
Farotimi’s Position on Mediation Efforts
Farotimi addressed reports that Peter Obi had visited Afe Babalola in Ado-Ekiti to plead for leniency, stating unequivocally that he neither authorized nor supported such actions. Temokun, recounting the visit, quoted Farotimi as saying:
“I have never sent anyone, including Peter Obi, to beg on my behalf. I want this matter to follow its natural course. Let the truth be tested in court.”
Farotimi also expressed confidence in the integrity of his writings, asserting that if any falsehoods were found in his book, he would accept the consequences. However, he maintained that his claims were rooted in truth and vowed to prevail in the legal battle.
Legal and Procedural Concerns
Temokun raised concerns about the timing of the lawsuits filed against Farotimi, noting that they were initiated only after his arrest and subsequent detention in Ekiti. He criticized the strategy of serving legal processes on Farotimi while he remains in custody, unable to defend himself effectively.
“This book has been in circulation for some time. Why did they wait until his arrest to file these lawsuits? Why ensure he is silenced and out of circulation before raising these issues?” Temokun questioned.
Temokun further accused Farotimi’s opponents of attempting to manipulate the judicial process to suppress his voice, likening the situation to a historical miscarriage of justice.
Farotimi’s Resilience
Despite his incarceration, Farotimi remains defiant and resolute. Temokun described him as calm yet determined, stating that the activist’s resolve to fight for justice and expose the truth remains unwavering.
“He speaks calmly but with a loud message. He knows truths that many others do not. His fight is not just for himself but for the principles of justice and fairness,” Temokun said.
Calls for Justice
The situation has sparked broader questions about fairness and due process within the Nigerian legal system. Temokun urged citizens to demand transparency and accountability in the case, emphasizing the importance of hearing all sides before passing judgment.
“This storm will pass, and the truth will come to light. Justice, though delayed, cannot be denied,” he concluded.
Farotimi’s case continues to draw significant attention, highlighting the tension between free speech, legal accountability, and the use of judicial processes in Nigeria.
