US Denies Nuclear Threat as Tensions With Iran Escalate
The United States government has dismissed claims that recent remarks by Vice President JD Vance suggested the possibility of a nuclear strike against Iran.
The clarification came after Vance stated that US forces possess capabilities they “have not yet decided to use” in enforcing an ultimatum issued by President Donald Trump. His comment sparked speculation, particularly from critics who interpreted it as a veiled reference to nuclear options.
Responding to the backlash, the White House rejected the interpretation, insisting that Vance’s statement did not imply any plan to deploy nuclear weapons. The response was directed at criticism linked to an account associated with former Vice President Kamala Harris, which had suggested otherwise.
Meanwhile, tensions continue to rise following strong warnings from Trump, who issued a stark ultimatum to Iran. He warned that the country could face devastating consequences if its leadership fails to meet US demands, including reopening the Strait of Hormuz to global shipping.
Trump set a deadline for Iran to comply, stating that failure to act could result in severe military action. In a series of statements, he also suggested that critical infrastructure such as power plants and bridges could be targeted.
Reports indicate that multiple strikes have already hit key locations in Iran, including transport infrastructure. In one incident in Kashan, at least two people were reported killed, with several others injured.
In response to the escalating situation, Israeli forces warned civilians in Iran to avoid railways and train travel temporarily, citing security concerns. There have also been reports of attacks on Kharg Island, a crucial hub for Iran’s oil exports.
As the standoff intensifies, global attention remains fixed on whether diplomatic efforts can de-escalate the crisis or if further military action will follow.
