HomeHeadlinenewsREACTIONS ON PROBE OF RIVERS EMERGENCY RULE FINANCES BY STATE ASSEMBLY &...

REACTIONS ON PROBE OF RIVERS EMERGENCY RULE FINANCES BY STATE ASSEMBLY & REJECTION BY ADMINISTRATOR.

1. Rivers Probe Dispute: What the Law Really Says About Ibas’ Six-Month Spending

Excerpt:

“The Constitution is clear — oversight of emergency rule spending depends on whether funds were federal or state. Due process must guide the probe.” — Prof. Akin Oyebode, Constitutional Lawyer.

2. Beyond Politics: Clarifying Oversight of Rivers’ Emergency Rule Finances

Excerpt:

“This is not the time for political vendetta. Accountability must continue, but through the correct audit channels — either the State Auditor-General or the National Assembly.” — Civil Society Situation Room.

3. Accountability or Vendetta? Rivers Assembly’s Probe of Ibas in Legal Context

Excerpt:

“The Assembly must be careful not to create the impression of witch-hunting. The priority should be service delivery, not political score-settling.” — Dr. Gloria Fraser MFR, National Patriots.

4. Who Should Audit Rivers’ Emergency Rule Funds — State Assembly or National Assembly?

Excerpt:

“During emergency rule, the National Assembly assumes the powers of the suspended House. It follows that federally backed spending should be accounted for in Abuja, not Port Harcourt.” — Former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President.

5. Ibas vs Rivers Assembly: Why Oversight Must Follow the Constitution, Not Politics

Excerpt:

“Sole Administrators are answerable to the authority that appointed them — the President — and ultimately to the National Assembly under Section 11(4). Rivers Assembly must respect that boundary.” — Legal Defence and Assistance Project (LEDAP).

6. Lessons from Plateau and Ekiti: How Past Sole Administrators Were Held to Account

Excerpt:

“In Plateau (2004) and Ekiti (2006), emergency spending was audited federally, with reports tabled in Abuja. Rivers should follow those precedents instead of inventing a new, confrontational path.” — Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD).

7. Peace or Probes? Rivers Assembly Urged to Focus on Governance, Not Vindictiveness

Excerpt:

“Rivers is just emerging from six months of tension. The Assembly has urgent governance issues — from budget arrears to service delivery. Political vendettas will only reopen wounds.” — Transition Monitoring Group (TMG).

8. Rivers at a Crossroads: Balancing Accountability and Stability After Emergency Rule

Excerpt:

“Democracy is restored. What Rivers needs now is reconciliation, not recrimination. Audits should proceed quietly, while lawmakers focus on moving the state forward.” — African Union Election Observation Mission.

9. Audit First, Politics Later: A Legal Roadmap for Rivers’ Six-Month Expenditures

Excerpt:

“The proper path is simple: map which funds were state, which were federal, and let the right Auditor-General file reports. That avoids political theatre and keeps governance stable.” — Budget Transparency Advocacy Network.

10. Democracy Restored in Rivers: Why Moving Forward Matters More Than Backward Probes

Excerpt:

“Rivers people want peace and progress. Endless probes risk dragging the state back into conflict. Accountability should serve the people, not politics.” — Community Development Coalition of Rivers State.

The National Patriots ©

Dr. G. Fraser. MFR. The National Patriots.
Dr. G. Fraser. MFR.
The National Patriots.

- Advertisement -spot_img
Must Read
Related News
- Advertisement -spot_img