An Abuja High Court has struck out the criminal defamation charges filed by the Federal Government against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, effectively ending a case that sparked nationwide legal and political debate.
The ruling was delivered on Thursday, January 15, bringing to a close the prosecution of the lawmaker representing Kogi Central Senatorial District.
WHY THE CASE WAS STRUCK OUT
Court documents showed that the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) filed a Notice of Discontinuance, prompting the court to formally strike out the charges of criminal defamation and related offences.
The notice, dated December 12, 2025, was acknowledged during Thursday’s sitting, leading to the termination of Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025.
Presiding judge, Justice C. N. Oji, noted the withdrawal and struck out the case accordingly.
COURT’S POSITION
While ruling, Justice Oji stressed the need for restraint in the use of prosecutorial powers, especially in a democratic setting.
“The court hopes that this decision will pave the way for restraint, healing, and respect for the rule of law in our democratic process,” the judge stated.
Counsel to the Federal Government confirmed the withdrawal in open court, explaining that it was carried out in line with the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA).
“This decision is taken in the overall interest of justice and public confidence in the legal system,” the government lawyer added.
BACKSTORY: WHY THE CASE DREW NATIONAL ATTENTION
The charges against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan stemmed from comments she allegedly made during a televised interview, which the government claimed amounted to criminal defamation.
The prosecution quickly became controversial, igniting debates on freedom of expression, political accountability, and the limits of state power. Several civil society organisations and rights groups criticised the case, describing it as an attempt to suppress dissent and political speech.
WHAT THIS MEANS GOING FORWARD
With the charges now struck out, legal observers say the decision could influence future discussions on the balance between government authority and individual rights within Nigeria’s democratic framework.
For many, the ruling marks not just the end of a legal case, but a significant moment in the ongoing conversation about free speech and the rule of law in Nigeria.
