The Confederation of African Football (CAF) has launched an official investigation into reported misconduct during the quarter-finals of the AFCON 2025 tournament, describing the incidents as behaviour that falls short of acceptable standards.
In a statement issued on Sunday, CAF confirmed that it is examining events from two quarter-final fixtures — the clash between host nation Morocco and Cameroon, as well as Nigeria’s encounter with Algeria.
The football body disclosed that it has already collected match officials’ reports alongside relevant video recordings from both matches. Preliminary reviews, according to CAF, suggest there may have been inappropriate actions involving both players and team officials, prompting the matter to be escalated to CAF’s Disciplinary Board.
“The CAF Disciplinary Board will carry out a comprehensive review, and necessary sanctions will be applied if any party is found culpable,” the statement said.
CAF further noted that the investigation is not limited to events on the pitch. Additional video materials are being reviewed concerning alleged misconduct by members of the media within the mixed zone — an area reserved for regulated post-match interviews and engagements.
The continental governing body reiterated its firm opposition to any form of improper behaviour at its competitions, particularly actions targeting match officials or tournament organisers. CAF stressed that it maintains a strict zero-tolerance policy toward conduct that compromises the credibility and professionalism of its tournaments.
“CAF will take decisive action against anyone whose conduct does not meet the required standards of respect and professionalism at its events,” the statement added.
The investigation comes at a time when refereeing decisions and post-match behaviour at AFCON 2025 have come under intense spotlight, with several quarter-final encounters generating widespread debate among teams, officials, and fans across Africa.
As CAF continues its review of alleged misconduct involving players, officials, and media representatives, what disciplinary measures do you believe would be appropriate? Share your views below.
