HomeUncategorizedDEMOLITION WITHOUT NOTICE

DEMOLITION WITHOUT NOTICE

SPECIAL REPORT

ADS 7

Demolition Without Notice: Retired Army General’s Investment Razed in Abuja Raises Legal, Ethical and Civil–Military Concerns

 

The demolition of a recreation garden owned by a retired General of the Nigerian Army in Abuja has sparked serious questions about the conduct of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Development Control, humanitarian considerations in enforcement actions, and the implications for relations between the FCT Administration and the Nigerian military establishment.

 

The General, who served Nigeria honourably for 35 years, reportedly ran a modest hospitality outfit—an open-air garden serving food and drinks—when bulldozers arrived and leveled the entire premises. No formal notice, written warning, demolition order, or evacuation period was issued. His fridges, freezers, crockery, furniture, documents, and personal equipment were flattened, despite his plea to the Director of Development Control, Galadima, for 24 hours to retrieve his belongings. The request was refused.

 

This rigid approach appears unnecessarily punitive and has already triggered quiet resentment within military circles—not ideal at a time when civil–military cooperation is crucial.

 

▪︎. WHAT THE LAW SAYS — AND WHY IT MATTERS

 

□ The Constitution Protects Even Illegal Occupants

 

Even persons occupying land without legal approval still retain rights under the 1999 Constitution:

 

Section 36 (Right to Fair Hearing):

No person shall be deprived of his rights or property without being given an opportunity to be heard.

Demolition without notice violates this principle.

Section 34 (Right to Dignity):

Actions that humiliate, degrade, or treat a person with brutality—even in enforcement—can be interpreted as violations.

 

Section 44 (Compulsory Acquisition):

Government cannot deprive a person of property or economic investment without due process, notice, and in some cases compensation where legitimate expectation exists.

 

Even if the property was illegal, due notice must be served; the owner must be allowed to evacuate personal belongings.

 

□ FCT Urban and Regional Planning Regulations Require Notice

 

Under the Nigeria Urban and Regional Planning Act (1992) and the FCT Development Control Standards, authorities must issue:

 

Notice to Quit

 

Contravention Notice

 

Stop Work Order

 

Demolition Notice

 

Typically, occupants are given several days to weeks depending on the severity of violation. Abrupt demolition without these steps is a breach of administrative procedure.

 

□ Retired Military Officers Have Recognised Privileges

 

While not above the law, retired senior officers are recognised under:

 

Armed Forces Remuneration and Privileges Laws

 

Military Pensions Act

ADS 8

They are considered “deserving of honour befitting their service”.

At minimum, this demands respectful treatment, dignified communication, and humane enforcement—not bulldozers arriving without notice as if executing a vendetta.

 

▪︎. THE FCT MINISTER’S VISION — A LEGITIMATE REFORM AGENDA

 

It is important to note that the FCT Minister is pursuing an ambitious effort to reorganise Abuja into a properly structured, world-standard capital city. This includes:

 

Removing illegal structures

 

Reclaiming green areas

 

Restoring masterplan zones

 

Establishing properly licensed parks, recreation zones, and public gardens

 

These are valid developmental objectives. Free enterprise thrives best when order and planning exist. The Minister is constitutionally mandated, under Section 302, to manage FCT land on behalf of the President.

 

However, reforms must remain lawful, humane, and procedurally correct.

▪︎. THE HUMAN DIMENSION — THE GENERAL’S LOSS

 

A man who gave three and a half decades to national security deserves empathy. Losing his retirement investment without notice—alongside personal items, working tools, and business assets—is emotionally and financially devastating.

 

Even if the structure was not fully approved, nothing justified refusing him a single day to clear his belongings. Such harshness erodes trust and fuels unnecessary resentment.

 

▪︎ POTENTIAL CIVIL–MILITARY TENSIONS — AN AVOIDABLE RISK

 

Coming shortly before the Lt. Yerima–Wike confrontation, this demolition risks deepening a perception that FCT authorities are increasingly confrontational toward the Nigerian military community.

This is dangerous.

Military officers and FCT officials both serve the same country. Their roles differ, but their loyalty aligns. Administrative conflicts must not snowball into institutional bitterness.

 

▪︎ HOW OTHER COUNTRIES HANDLE SUCH CASES

 

United States / Canada (North America)

 

Illegal structures are demolished only after:

 

Formal notice

 

Posted warning on property

 

Opportunity to remove belongings

 

Grace period

 

Right to challenge decision

 

Humanitarian considerations trump bureaucratic speed.

 

UK / EU Countries (Europe)

 

Evictions and demolitions involve:

 

Multiple written notices

 

Social welfare consultation

 

Compensation or relocation options

 

Strict procedural fairness

 

Even illegal squatters have enforceable rights.

 

South Africa / Kenya (Africa)

Constitutional courts insist on:

 

Adequate notice

 

Dignified evacuation

 

Protection of personal property

 

Prohibition of night or surprise demolitions

 

 

UAE / Qatar (Asia/Middle East)

 

Highly planned cities still provide:

 

Warnings

 

Grace periods

 

Assistance to remove items

 

Structured enforcement

 

No country with a functional system destroys personal belongings without notice.

 

▪︎ HOW THE SITUATION SHOULD HAVE BEEN HANDLED

 

Balanced Best Practice Approach:

 

▪︎ Issue a contravention notice.

▪︎ Provide time to evacuate equipment.

 

▪︎ Offer guidance on alternative compliant locations.

 

▪︎ Engage respectfully with the retired General.

 

▪︎ Ensure law enforcement supervises peacefully.

 

▪︎ Document all steps to avoid claims of vendetta.

 

This preserves legality, humanity, and government credibility.

 

▪︎ CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION

The demolition of the retired General’s business without notice violates both legal expectations and moral standards. While the FCT Minister’s goal to restore Abuja’s masterplan is commendable and necessary, enforcement must be lawful, humane, and procedurally fair.

 

Failure to do so risks:

 

Civil–military misunderstandings

Public resentment

 

Avoidable litigation

 

Perception of vendetta or selective enforcement

 

A senior citizen who served Nigeria for 35 years deserves better treatment—not immunity, but dignity.

 

Development Control must adopt a more humanitarian, lawful, and transparent approach going forward.

“Independent findings by HeadlineNews.News further revealed that the retired General lacked the required legal approvals for the hospitality garden and had repeatedly ignored formal notices served to him prior to the demolition.”

The military ought to advise their officers to ensure they do things legally to avoid embarrassment or loss.

Watch the video below:

The National Patriots Movement.

For full report, visit: www.headlinenews.news

“No nation treats its heroes this way. A retired General who served Nigeria for 35 years deserved notice—not a bulldozer. Development must follow the law and basic humanity. Even illegal occupants have rights under the Constitution, yet his property, equipment and personal belongings were crushed without warning. This is not enforcement; it is insensitivity. Abuja can be reorganised without humiliating those who sacrificed for the country. The FCT must correct this approach now, before administrative zeal becomes institutional hostility. Patriotism demands fairness, dignity and due process—for every Nigerian.” – The National Patriots.

The demolition of a retired General’s recreation garden in Abuja without notice has raised serious concerns about due process, fairness, and humane governance. Development Control reportedly crushed the 35-year veteran’s fridges, freezers, documents and furniture after refusing his appeal for just one day to evacuate his belongings. Even illegal occupants are entitled to fair hearing and dignity under Sections 36 and 34 of the 1999 Constitution, while urban planning laws require proper notices before demolition. The FCT Minister’s vision to restore Abuja is commendable, but enforcement must remain lawful and humane, not punitive. Treating a man who served Nigeria dutifully with such disregard risks unnecessary civil–military tension. Development must never override basic justice and respect.

Headline news

Dr. Imran Khazaly.

The National Patriots Movement.

Headlinenews.news Special Investigative Report.

- Advertisement -spot_img
Must Read
Related News
- Advertisement -spot_img