Prince Harry has intensified his legal battle against the publisher of the Daily Mail, alleging that unlawful surveillance also targeted his brother, Prince William, and sister-in-law, Kate Middleton.
In a London High Court hearing on Thursday, Harry’s lawyer claimed Associated Newspapers engaged in “blagging” — the use of deception to access private information — including during William’s 21st birthday celebrations. The accusations form part of a broader privacy case involving high-profile co-claimants such as Sir Elton John.
Associated Newspapers has strongly rejected the allegations, describing them as “preposterous,” and is seeking to have parts of the case dismissed as being out of time.
If successful, Harry could secure millions in damages, similar to his £12 million settlement with News Group Newspapers, alongside formal apologies and legal cost caps of up to £5 million. However, an adverse ruling could see the case struck out entirely, a setback that would not only intensify his strained royal ties but also undermine his campaign against press intrusion.
Observers note that the outcome could have far-reaching implications for media accountability in the UK, potentially rekindling debates last seen during the Leveson Inquiry into press ethics.
